Ashley Catron
discusses the history of gun control in “The Fallacy of Gun Control in America”
(?), a proposal argument which argues that gun control was mentioned in the
Bill of Rights to protect people from tyrannical acts. Catron supports this
claim by providing examples that are evident throughout the history of the
United States as well as the world. Catron’s purpose is to inform individuals
who do not know the historic side of gun control laws what can happen when gun
laws are passed, in order to establish reasoning behind why gun control laws
are absurd, as evident throughout history. The intended audiences are
individuals who either support or do not support strict gun laws and Catron
establishes a relationship with the audience by providing emotional examples.
We find ourselves
agreeing with Catron on this matter. Catron is absolutely right that guns can
protect us from those who seek to do us harm for no apparent reason. There are
many individuals out there who seek to enslave a group of people or person. If
these people have the option of owning a firearm, then the safety aspect of
their life increases a bit. While we do agree that criminals use weapons for
bad reasons, that alone is not a big enough reason to control gun ownership.
Catron provides
examples of historical events to back up her claim that “defense of one’s life
is an inalienable right.” First and foremost, President John Kennedy, Martin
Luther King Junior, and Robert Kennedy were assassinated in the 1960’s (Catron
321). Catron implies that this in turn created the 1968 Gun Control Act “banning
the interstate shipment of firearms to individuals and strengthening other
licensing and regulatory measures” ( 321). Catron then goes on to describe yet
another shooting in which President Ronald Reagan, James Brady, Timothy
McCarthy, and Thomas Delahanty were involved and again, another gun control law
was passed (Catron 322). We can’t forget to mention perhaps one of the most
known events in history, the Nazi Holocaust. According to Catron “millions of
unarmed Jews in Europe were slaughtered” (322) because guns were outlawed. If
these individuals had guns to defend themselves, would the holocaust have
happened? “The defense of one’s life is an inalienable right,” (Catron 324) and
according to Catron, this right cannot be infringed (325).
Works Cited
Catron, Ashley. “The Fallacy of Gun Control Laws in America” Connections. Southlake: Fountainhead Press, 2013. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment